Evaluation of Antibacterial Activities and Formulation of Black Mahlab Seeds Aqueous Extract
Murtada Ahmed Oshi
Department of
Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Omdurman Islamic University,
Omdurman, Sudan
ABSTRACT:
Black
mahlab is an annual herb with a rigid, brown seeds indigenous
to Sudan. Its seeds are widely used in Sudanese traditional medicine in the
treatment of diarrhea and other abdominal upsets. The objective of the present
study is to verify this claim in scientific manner. Therefore, the seeds were
tested for in-vitro antibacterial
activity and then formulated into a tablet dosage form. The water extract of
the seeds was tested against common diarrheal- causing bacteria. Assays were
performed using extract concentrations of 25, 50, 100 and 150mg/ml, and agar
well diffusion method was utilized. In formulation aspect two formulae were
prepared formula-1and formula-2 by using maize starch and polyvinyl pyrrolidine as binder respectively. Starch paste as cost
effective binder was evaluated for its binding properties in comparison with
polyvinyl pyrrolidine. The results obtained from
evaluation of granule properties and quality control tests of the tablets for
both formulae were pharmaceutically satisfactory (p ≤0.05). According to pharmacopoeial specifications tablets of formula-1 had less
mechanical strength than those of formula-2, but rapidly disintegrated and
released the content more successfully than tablets of formula-2. Therefore,
tablets of formula-1 were subjected to further stability studies and positive
results were obtained. The findings of the work explored tablets of formula-1
were cost- effective; with adequate strength to withstand the shocks during
storage, dispensing, and handling; and release its contents for antibacterial
activity successfully.
KEYWORDS: Bacteria, Black mahlab, Tablets, Phytochemical constituents
INTRODUCTION:
Plants
and plant products have been used extensively throughout history to treat
medical problems. A number of traditional herbal medical practices have been
adopted for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of various diseases. Many
such practices were experimentally proved depicting the scientific
insight behind their traditional uses. Low harm, high activity, patient
compliance are the reasons for choosing drug from herbal medicines.
Infections are one of the
main causes
of death
in under- developed countries
where it is associated with poverty and malnutrition. A huge number of herbal medicines
are used as antimicrobial remedies for many infectious diseases. Numerous
studies have been carried out to extract various natural products for screening
antimicrobial activity. [1]
Black mahlab
scientifically named Monechma ciliatum Jacq
belongs to Acanthaceae family is an effective antimicrobial
herb.
Its seeds (Figure 1) are used
widely in Sudanese folksy medicine by traditional healers for gastrointestinal
tract upsets e.g. diarrhea. So it was very interesting to select this
plant which can help in the treatment of infections.
Figure 1: Black Mahlab Seed
The main objectives of the
present study were evaluation of in-vitro antibacterial activity of the
dry- aqueous extract (DAE) of seeds of Monechma
ciliatum and formulation of the extract to tablet
dosage form. Beside, other general objectives were: 1) to entice the
pharmacists in particular and other healthcare professionals in general to be
active in researching about herbal medicine realm, 2) to fill the fictional
gaps between the herbal and synthetic medicines in fields of efficacy and safety,
and 3) to establish and implement the most updated scientific knowledge and
manufacturing technologies in herbal medicines formulation and
manufacturing.
In
this study I selected the DAE of seeds of Monechma
ciliatum based on a
combination of ethnopharmacology and daily healer’s
practices. 2g of the
seeds powder is usually soaked in 500ml of distilled water overnight and drunk
for diarrhea. Although, the seeds were effective but it lacks of
standardization and poor-quality presentation. However, to improve its efficacy
and patient acceptance, there is need to formulate the seeds into tablet
dosage form. The extract used in this research is closely resembled to
traditional preparations used by natives in Nubia Mountains regions of Sudan to treat diarrhoea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The seeds
The
seeds were purchased from Omdurman Market for Herbal Products, Omdurman,
Sudan on august, 2012 and identified at Department
of Pharmacognosy,
Omdurman Islamic University (voucher number 31). The seeds were separated, dried
under shedding and stored
in a covered bottle at room temperature until required for use.
Chemicals
Ampicillin (Bristol –Mayers Squibb, USA); Crosscarmellose cellulose (A Johnson Matthey, UK); Gentamicin (Roussel, UK); Lactose
(Breckland Scientific Supplier, UK); Magnesium stearate (Breckland Scientific
Supplier, UK); Maize starch (A Johnson Matthey, UK); Microcrystalline cellulose (A Johnson
Matthey, UK); Mueller-Hinton agar and Mueller-Hinton broth (HiMedia
Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India); Polyvinyl pyrrolidine
(Acros Oragnics, Belgium);
Talc (A Johnson Matthey, UK).
Bacteria strains used
In
this study, the Standard bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), Klebsiella
pneumoniae (ATCC 53657), Escherichia coli (ATCC
25922) obtained from Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Omdurman
Islamic University, Sudan.
Methods
Extraction procedure
100g of the coarse seed powder
was transferred to a flask containing 2000ml of distilled water. The flask was
allowed for 24h at room temperature, the content passed through a cotton wool
and the solid residue pressed (screw press). The strained and expressed liquid
obtained were mixed, put for 12h for clarification and filtrated by Whatman
filter paper No 42 (125 mm). Finally,
the filtrate was evaporated using rotary evaporator (Stuart Ltd, Germany) under
reduced pressure at 40şC, placed in a Petri dish, and left to dry to constant
weight.
Preliminary phytochemical analysis
Qualitative
screening of the seeds of Monechma ciliatum was performed for the identification of active
phytochemical constituents using standard procedures
described by Tiwari et al. [2]
Preparation of tested bacteria
An
overnight culture of tested bacteria were prepared in Mueller Hinton Broth and
later adjusted to 0.5 Mc Farland (optical density, OD
0.5) according to method described by Lopez et al. [3]
Preparation of the extracts for
antibacterial testing
The sterile DAE was redissolved in sterile distilled water and serial
dilutions of the extract were prepared (25, 50, 100, 150mg/ml).
Preparation of standard
drug
Gentamicin and ampicillin
were used as standard drugs. Serial dilutions of both were prepared (0.005,
0.01, 0.02 and 0.04 mg/ml) by using sterile distilled water as solvent.
Evaluation of in-vitro antibacterial activity of the
extract
The
antibacterial testing of the DAE was carried out using the agar diffusion
method as described by Lino and Deogracious.
[4]
Minimum inhibitory concentration determination
The Minimum inhibitory concentration of the DAE
was determined by using the method described by Fabry
et al. [5]
Preformulation studies
1. pH measurement
The pH of the aqueous solution
of DAE was measured by using pH- meter (Wagtech
International, UK).
2. Loss on dry
The moisture content was measured at different points
during tablets manufacturing steps by loss on dry (LOD) method. Approximately
5g of sample was uniformly placed onto the sample pan of moisture instrument
(Kern Ltd, Germany), and the heated. The percentage of moisture was calculated
from the weight loss of the sample by heating. The instrument was allowed to
cool between tests.
3. Powder flow estimation
According
to USP, [6] the flow were measured at different points within
the manufacturing process by using angle of repose method. 30g of tested
material was poured manually into funnel hanged at
3cm height, and then the angle was measured.
4. Powder Density
According
to USP, [6] the bulk density, tapped density and Carr's index
of final- blended granules were measured. The bulk and tapped densities of
final- blended granule were determined according to the following method: a
50ml glass cylinder was weighed and filled with 30g of powder and reweighed.
The opening of the cylinder was secured and gently reversed once, and the
powder carefully levelled without compacting. Bulk volume was determined after one
mechanical tap. Tapped volume was measured after 500taps.
Formulation of the tablets
Technique of tablets preparation
Two
formulae were prepared by using wet granulation tabletting
technique. Formula- 1 by using starch as binder and formula- 2 by using
polyvinyl pyrrolidine as binder.
Calculation of the extract dose per tablet
150mg
of the extract was incorporated into the tablet, depending on the traditional
use of the seeds for diarrheal and abdominal upsets.
·
100g of the seed powder give 9.5g of the extract (Table 2)
·
2g (the weight of seed powder used in traditional preparations) gives 150mg of the extract.
Procedure of tablets preparation
For tablets of formula-1
According to formula in table 1,
DAE was weighed precisely, transferred to a beaker and labelled
(A). A specified amount of mixture of lactose, MCC and half amount of maize
starch was transferred to another beaker and labelled
(B). Both (A) and (B) were mixed together adequately by mortar and kneaded to a
wet mass by using starch paste 10% (w/v). The wet mass was forced manually
through a No. 10 mesh screen to form granules, which were placed in a hot air
oven at 40şC for 12h. The dried granules were resized using No. 32 mesh screen
to get uniform- sized granules. The dried granules were remixed with reminder
of maize starch, magnesium stearate and talc for
5min. The final lubricated- granule was transferred to a hopper of a single-
punch tabletting machine (Erweka,
Germany) and tabletted using die No. 10. The weight
and the pressure of the machine were adjusted to obtain a tablet of 500 mg.
For tablets of formula-2
For
tablets of formula-2, polyvinyl pyrrolidine
solution 1% (w/v) was used instead of starch paste 10% (w/v) and the same
procedure steps were carried out.
Table 1: Constituent of
tablet formula
|
Composition |
Formula-1 |
Formula-2 |
||
|
Weight
in tablet (g) |
Conc. in tablet (Wt %) |
Weight
in tablet (g) |
Conc. in tablet (Wt %) |
|
|
DAE
(Active ingredient) |
150 |
30 |
150 |
30 |
|
Lactose
(Filler) |
142 |
28.4 |
125 |
25 |
|
MMC
(Filler) |
125 |
25 |
142 |
28.4 |
|
Starch
paste 10% w\v (Adhesive) |
q.s. |
- |
- |
- |
|
PVP
2% w\v (Adhesive) |
- |
- |
- |
q.s. |
|
Maize
starch (Disintegrant) |
50 |
10 |
50 |
10 |
|
Mg stearate (Lubricant) |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
|
Talc
(Glidants) |
25 |
5 |
25 |
5 |
|
Total
weight |
500 |
100 |
500 |
100 |
Evaluation of prepared tablets
1. Weight variation test
According
to USP, [6] 20 tablets were selected randomly from each batch
and weighed individually. The average weight and deviation of each tablet from
the mean were calculated. The standard deviation and percentage deviation were
calculated and compared with standard.
2. Hardness test
The
test was done according to method described by Kiran et
al., [7] 10
tablets were placed between jaws of hardness test apparatus (Erweka, Germany) and the force required breaking the tablet
was noted.
3. Friability
The
friability test was carried out according method described in USP. [6] 20 tablets were weighed, placed in
friability tester (Erweka, Germany) and rotated up to
100 revolutions. The tablets were reweighed after removal of fines and the
percentage of weight loss was calculated.
4. Disintegration test
The
disintegration test was carried out according method described in USP, [6]
under botanical dosage forms. Six tablets were placed individually in
each tube of disintegration test apparatus (G.B. Caleva,
England). The water was maintained at a temperature of 37°±2°C and time taken
for the entire tablet to disintegrate completely was noted.
5. Dissolution test
5.1. Screening of the extract
The
whole extract was selected as a marker. 0.2g of the extract was placed in two a
100ml flasks and 100ml of 0.1M HCl and distilled
water was added separately. The flasks were shaken, and then filtered through a
Whatman filter paper. The absorption spectrum of the both solutions of the
extract was recorded using a UV spectrophotometer (Jenway
Ltd, UK) and the wavelength for maximum absorption was determined.
5.2.
Drawing of the calibration curve of the extract
Different
concentrations of the extract were prepared to contain between 0.01 to
0.2mg/ml of extract in 0.1M HCl and distilled water
separately. The absorbance of each concentration in each case was taken at
wavelength 275nm (maximum absorption wavelength) and plotted against the
various concentrations to obtain the calibration curve for the extract for both
solvents.
5.3. Dissolution test procedure
The dissolution test was carried
out according method described in USP, [6] under botanical
dosage forms. The dissolution tester (G.B. Caleva,
England) was filled with 900ml of 0.1M HCl and water
separately as medium, and allowed to warm up to 37±0.5şC. 6 tablets were
selected randomly and individually introduced into dissolution tester
(apparatus 2, 75rpm). Then the machine was operated for 60min. 10ml of sample
was withdrawn in different time intervals (10, 20, 30, 40, 60 min), filtered
and assayed using UV method with reference to the standard.
Stability study of tablets of formula-1
Both
disintegration and dissolution tests were done after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of
storage of the tablets in glass bottle at room temperature 30±
2°C and relative humidity 60 ± 5.
Statistical Evaluation
The
data were statically analyzed by Students t-test and values were considered
significant. And value were expressed as p<0.05.
RESULTS:
The
results of antibacterial activity of the extract were summarized in table 2.
Table 2: Bioactivity of DAE and standard
antibiotics against standard bacteria
|
Extract |
Yield (±0.5) |
Conc. (mg/ml) |
Mean diameter of growth inhibition zone
(MDIZ) |
||||
|
S. aureus |
B. subtilis |
K. pneumoniae |
E. coli |
P. aeruginosa |
|||
|
Water |
9.50 |
25 |
- |
16 |
12 |
- |
– |
|
|
|
50 |
13 |
16 |
15 |
15 |
– |
|
|
|
100 |
18 |
25 |
18 |
17 |
– |
|
|
|
150 |
20 |
33 |
21 |
18 |
– |
|
Gentamicin |
|
0.005 |
12 |
16 |
12 |
11 |
– |
|
|
|
0.01 |
14 |
16 |
15 |
15 |
– |
|
|
|
0.02 |
16 |
22 |
19 |
18 |
– |
|
|
|
0.04 |
20 |
30 |
33 |
22 |
– |
|
Ampicillin |
|
0.005 |
– |
12 |
– |
– |
– |
|
|
|
0.01 |
– |
13 |
– |
– |
– |
|
|
|
0.02 |
– |
14 |
– |
– |
– |
|
|
|
0.04 |
– |
16 |
– |
– |
– |
|
D. Water |
|
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Data are presented as mean MDIZ
(mm) of three replicates; Inhibition zone 15mm: sensitive; 14-15mm:
intermediate; <15mm: resistant; - : no inhibition zone
The
minimum inhibitory concentrations of the extract were 12.5mg/ml for Bacillus
subtilis and 25mg/ml for
Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella
pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.
The results were detailed in table 3.
Table 3:
Minimum inhibitory concentration of the DAE
|
Conc. mg/ml |
Medium (ml) |
Inoculum
(ml) |
Water extract |
|||
|
Sa |
Bs |
Kp |
Ec |
|||
|
3.125 |
20 |
0.01 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
6.25 |
20 |
0.01 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
12.5 |
20 |
0.01 |
+ |
* |
+ |
+ |
|
25 |
20 |
0.01 |
* |
- |
* |
* |
|
50 |
20 |
0.01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(+): Growth; (-): No growth; (*): MIC; All
determinations were done in triplicates.
Sa: Staphylococcus aureus; Bs: Bacillus
subtilis; Kp: Klebsiella pneumoniae;
Ec: Escherichia coli
Phytochemical analysis of the Monechma
ciliatum seeds showed the presence of flavonoids, tannins, anthraquinones,
unsaturated sterols and triterpens (Table 1). These phytochemical compounds
have been reported in other studies to elicit antimicrobial and
astringent effects.
Table 4: Phytochemical
test results of seeds of Monechma Ciliatum
|
Test Name |
Observation |
Result |
|
Test for alkaloids |
No color change |
- |
|
Test for anthraquinones |
Pink precipitate |
++ |
|
Test for coumarins
|
No color change |
- |
|
Test for cyanogenic glycosides |
No color change |
- |
|
Test for flavonoids
|
Red colouration |
++ |
|
Test for saponins |
No color change |
- |
|
Test for tannins |
Green precipitate |
+ |
|
Test for triterpens |
Pink to purple precipitate |
+++ |
|
Test for unsaturated sterols |
Green to purple
precipitate |
+++ |
(+ + +):
appreciable amount; (+ +): moderate
amount; (+): minute amounts; (-): not detected
The
granules obtained for the both formulae were satisfactory. No rat holing was
observed during the flow of granules from the hopper and no capping and
sticking was not observed. The results were provided in table 5.
Table 5: Precompression (Preformulation)
study results
|
Measured
properties |
Formula-1 |
Formula-2 |
|
pH
of the DAE |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
Moisture
content (%) of wet- mass |
18.8 |
13.7 |
|
Moisture
content (%) of dry- granule |
1.2 |
1.4 |
|
Moisture
content (%) of final- granule |
1.5 |
1.6 |
|
Angle
of repose (°) of dry-granule |
20.47 |
16.38 |
|
Angle
of repose (°) of final- granule |
19.62 |
16.64 |
|
Bulk
density (g/ml) |
0.52 |
0.53 |
|
Tapped
density (g/ml) |
0.61 |
0.62 |
Figure 2:
Weight variation statistical analysis tablets of both formulae by SPSS-
computer- program
The
tablet post- compression parameters (weight variation, friability, hardness and
disintegration tests) were measured and the results were given in table 6 and
figures 2 and 3.
Table 6: Post-
Compression study results
|
Test
name |
Formula-1 |
Formula-2 |
|
%
Weight Variation |
1.2 |
2.1 |
|
%
Friability |
0.1 |
0.4 |
|
Hardness
(kg/cm2) |
6.5 |
8.4 |
|
Disintegration
time (min:
sec) |
8.3 |
11.7 |
Figure 3:
Hardness statistical analysis for tablets of both formulae by SPSS- computer- program
As
a drug efficiency depend upon its bioavailability, which is affected by
dissolution of the formulated drug tablet. [8] Formula-1
tablets were selected for further dissolution and stability studies. As the
formulated material was from natural plant origin that needs unusual methods to
assay as stated in USP, [6] under the article of botanical origin
require more vigorous procedure, marker selection method was used for the
dissolution test using the UV spectrophotometer at wavelength 275nm for the calibration
curve. The absorbencies obtained from the tablets were referred to the curves
(Table 7 and Figures 4, 5 and 6), and the percent dissolved was calculated in
different time intervals (Table 8).
Table 7: The
absorbance data by using HCl and water as dissolution
medium
|
No. |
Concentration (mg/ml) |
Absorbance in 0.1HCl |
Absorbance in distilled water |
|
1 |
0.03 |
0.179 |
0.164 |
|
2 |
0.06 |
0.319 |
0.301 |
|
3 |
0.09 |
0.474 |
0.422 |
|
4 |
0.12 |
0.621 |
0.601 |
|
5 |
0.15 |
0.763 |
0.671 |
Table 8: The
mean absorbance of six tablets in different time intervals by using 0.01N HCl and distilled water as dissolution medium
|
Time
of
dis. test |
Hydrochloric
acid |
Distilled
water |
||||
|
Average absorbance |
Extract amount
|
Percent dissolved |
Average absorbance |
Extract amount
|
Percent dissolved |
|
|
After
10 min |
0.572 |
0.747 |
74.77 |
0.490 |
0.724 |
66.97 |
|
After
20 min |
0.580 |
0.758 |
78.86 |
0.518 |
0.737 |
71.41 |
|
After
30 min |
0.598 |
0.781 |
81.21 |
0.588 |
0.745 |
72.78 |
|
After
40 min |
0.601 |
0.792 |
82.87 |
0.590 |
0.764 |
84.57 |
|
After
60 min |
0.700 |
0.936 |
90.21 |
0.600 |
0.779 |
85.41 |
Figure 4:
Computerized calibration curve of the fresh extract using 0.1N HCl as medium
Figure 5:
Computerized calibration curve of the fresh extract using distilled water as
medium
Figure 6:
Drug dissolved with time for both HCl and water
Table 9: Ongoing
study (disintegration test results)
|
Test
no. |
Time
of disintegration the test |
Time
(min: sec) |
|
1 |
At
zero time |
7.4 |
|
2 |
After
three month |
10.41 |
|
3 |
After
six month |
12.61 |
|
4 |
After
nine month |
14.58 |
Ongoing stability studies were
carried out for tablets of formula-1 up to nine months (0, 3, 6, 9 and 12
months); no considerable changes in disintegration and dissolution of tested
tablets were detected (Tables 9 and 10).
Table 10: Ongoing
study (dissolution test results)
|
No. |
Time of the test |
Absorbance after
1h |
Amount of the
drug |
Percent
dissolved |
|
1 |
At
zero time |
0.610 |
0.8357 |
83.57 |
|
2 |
After 3 months |
0.605 |
0.82885 |
82.85 |
|
3 |
After 6 months |
0.598 |
0.81926 |
81.92 |
|
4 |
After 9 months |
0.580 |
0.7946 |
79.46 |
|
5 |
After
12 months |
0.576 |
0.7679 |
77.57 |
DISCUSSIONS:
The bacteria selected in the
study were common diarrheal- causing pathogens. The extract inhibited Staphylococcus
aureus, Bacillus subtilis,
Klebsiella pneumoniae
and Escherichia coli with inhibition zone diameter 13 to 20, 16 to
33, 12 to 21 and 15 to 18mm respectively. The antibacterial activity of the
extract showed the highest activity against Bacillus subtilis
compared to the other bacteria used. Collectively, the growth of all bacteria
used was inhibited effectively and to different extent by the extract at
different concentrations; and were comparable to that exhibited by reference
antibacterial drug (as positive control) and distilled water (as negative
control).Wendakoon et al., [9] report
the greater the inhibition zone (measured in mm) indicates the higher
antibacterial effect. Pseudomonas aeruginosa neither
was sensitive to the extract nor to standard antibiotics used gentamicin and ampicillin. Omolola,[10]
state resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
to extracts may be due to its the permeability barrier afforded by its outer
membrane lippolysaccharide and its tendency to
colonize surfaces in the biofilm form makes the cells
impervious to therapeutic concentrations of antibiotics.
The relatively low MIC values
against tested bacteria means that the extract has the potential to treat any
ailments associated with these bacterial pathogens effectively and with high
potency. From the MIC results, it can be observed that Gram positive bacteria
are more susceptible than Gram negative bacteria to the extract. In Gram
negative bacteria, the outer phospholipidic membrane
carrying the structural lipopolysaccharide components
makes the cell wall impermeable to lipophilic
solutes. [11] Gram positive bacteria having only an outer peptidoglycan layer, thus is not an effective permeability
barrier. [12]
The
antibacterial activity test results were coincided with phytochemical
screening results (Table 4) and with the native people traditional practices
that use primarily water as the solvent for extraction of the plant seeds for
diarrhea. This study found that water provided more consistency in
antibacterial activity. The antibacterial activity of the extract was
attributed to flavonoids and tannins, that acted by
different mechanisms comparable to the standard antibiotics, and with large
margin of safety. Doss et
al.,[13] report
tannins have antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Rhama and Madhavan,
[14] report flavonoids
have antibacterial activity against Escherchia
coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae
and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
The granules produced were of
acceptable quality. The goals of preformulation
studies are to choose the correct form of the drug substance, evaluate its
physical and chemical properties, and generate a thorough understanding of the
material’s stability under the conditions that will lead to the development of
a practical drug delivery system. [15]
In the process of formulation of
an effective tablet dosage form from the DAE, the wet granulation technique was
used. Wet granulation technique was used due to the extract high dose and poor
compatibility of its powder. These two factors are not favourable for the manufacture of tablet by other
techniques (direct and dry granulation). Majekodunm et
al., [16] report
in preparation of tablet from natural products wet granulation appears to
produce tablets of acceptable mechanical and drug release properties than those
prepared by direct compression. The whole plant extract was chosen for
the formulation due to the probability of synergistic action. Plant metabolites
are present in complex mixtures, each containing various functional groups; a phytochemical matrix will exhibit multiple functionalities
and bioactivities. [17]
Two formulae were designed, one
containing maize starch as a binder (formula- 1), and other containing PVP
(formula-2). Both formulae contain MCC/maize starch, magnesium stearate, and talc as the disintegrant,
lubricant, and glidant respectively at recommended levels.
The batch size was maintained at 250g for each trial. Each granulation batch
used the same quantity of water for granulation, theoretically, 16% or 40ml.
The use of colouring and flavouring
agents were not needed as the extract was mutually coloured
and flavoured (brown colour
with aromatic flavour), and the presence of high
content of lactose in the both formulae masked the bitter taste of extract. The
tablets were compressed at the specified weight (500mg).
The higher
weight variation of the tablets was 2% for tablets of formula-2 but still
within the acceptable weight variation range of ± 5%. Tablets of both formulae
passed the weight variation test with p<0.05 (Table 6 and Figure 2). The
variation of the weight of individual tablet is a valid indication of the
corresponding variation in the drug content. [18] Hardness of tablets of both
formulae was complied with the requirements stated in official pharmacopeias
with p<0.05 (Table 6 and Figure 3). Hardness indicates the capability of a
tablet to withstand mechanical shocks during handling in manufacturing,
packaging and shipping. [19] The tablets of both formulae
disintegrated before 20min. The high hardness value and long disintegration
time of formula-2 tablets was attributed to polymer used. Hirasawa
et al., [20] conclude their research use of PVP as
tablets binder increase the hardness of tablets.
0.01M HCl
was better than distilled water as dissolution medium (Table 8 and Figure 6),
this may be attributed to the relatively weak alkalinity of the extract (pH
7.5). Therefore, 0.01M HCl was proposed as
dissolution medium for further stability tests. Both disintegration and
dissolution tests were carried out after storage at room temperature, for three
months, six months, and nine months. Tablets of formula- 1 were stable for nine
months as shown in tables 9 and 10. The increasing of disintegration time
(Table 9) and decreasing of percent dissolved in dissolution test (Table 10)
may be attributed to the increase of hardness of tablets by loss of moisture
via evaporation.
Tablet of both formulae complied
with the standard requirements regarding their weight variation, friability,
hardness, disintegration, and dissolution. A cost effective formulation was
adopted using starch as binder. The dissolution test of tablets of formula-1
was carried out to assay the amount of the dissolved ingredients, by measuring
the amount of the dissolved ingredients in different time intervals, which gave
positive scientific prediction about the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability.
Tablets of formula- 1 were stable for twelve months as shown in the ongoing
stability results.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
I thankful to Omdurman Islamic
University, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology for providing the
laboratory facilities to perform the research work.
REFERENCES:
1.
Abu- Shanab B, Adwan
G, Abu- Safia D and Adwan
NJ. Antibacterial Activities of Some Plant Extracts Utilized in Popular
Medicine in Palestine. Turkey Journal of Biology. 28; 2004: 99-102.
2.
Tatiya A, Tapadiya G, Kotecha S and Surana S. Effect of
Solvents on Total Phenolics, Antioxidant and
Antimicrobial Properties of Bridelia retusa Spreng Stem Bark. Indian
Journal of Natural Product Research. 2(4); 2011: 442-447.
3.
Lopez CM, Nitisinprasert S, Wanchaitanawong P and Poovarodom
N. Antimicrobial Activity of Medicinal Plant Extract against Food Borne
Spoilage and Pathogenic Microorganisms. Kasetsart
Journal of Natural Science. 37; 2003:460-467.
4.
Lino A and Deogracious
O. The In-vitro Antibacterial Activity of Annona
senegalensis, Securidacca longipendiculata and Steganotaenia
araliacea Ugandan Medicinal Plants. African
Health Science. 6(1); 2006: 31-35.
5.
Fabry
W, Okemo P, Ansorg R. Fungistatic and Fungicidal Activity of East African Medicinal Plants. Mycoses.
39(1-2); 1996: 67–70.
6.
United State Pharmacopeia (USP). The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention. 2007.
7. Kiran NR, Palanichamy
S, Rajesh M, Rajadhas TG, Anusha
V and Parasakthi
N. Formulation and Evaluation of Orodispersible Piroxicam
Tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research. 2(10); 2010:
615-621.
8. Murphy R and John R. Current St
John s wart research from mode of action to clinical efficacy. Pharmacology
Research. 47(2); 2003: 101-109.
9. Wendakoon C, Calderon P and Gagnon D.
Evaluation of Selected Medicinal Plants Extracted in Different Ethanol
Concentrations. Journal of Medicinally Active Plants. 1(2);
2012:60-68.
10. Omolola O. The Isolation of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa From Septic Sore Using Some Biological
Tests. Internet Journal of Food Safety. 13; 2011:188-90.
11. Adwan K and Abu-Hasan
N. Gentamicin Resistance in Clinical Strains of Enterobacteriaceae Associated with Reduced Gentamicin Uptake. Folia Microbiology.43;1998:
438-440.
12. Scherrer R and Gerhardt P. Molecular
sieving by the Bacillus megaterium cell wall
and protoplast. Journal of Bacteriology. 107(3); 1971:718-735.
13. Doss A, Mohammed M and Dhanabalan R. Antibacterial Activity of Tannins from the
Leaves of Solanum trilobatum
Linn. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2(2); 2009: 41-43.
14. Rhama S and Madhavan
S. Antibacterial Activity of the Flavonoid, Patulitrin Isolated from the Flowers of Tagetes
erecta L. International Journal of
Pharmaceutical Technology Research. 3(3) 2011:1407-1409.
15. Niazi SK. Hand book of preformulation chemical, biological and botanical drugs. Informa health care, New York. 2006.
16. Majekodunmi SO, Adegoke
OA and Odeku OA. Formulation of the extract of the
stem bark of Alstonia boonei
as tablet dosage form. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.
7 (2); 2008: 987-994.
17. Cseke LJ, Kirakosyan A,
Kaufman P, Warber S, Duke J and Brielmann
HL. Natural Products from Plants. CRC Press, New York. 2006.
18. Rawlins EA. Bentley’s text book
of pharmaceutics. Bailliere Tindal, London. 1977.
19.
Banker GS, and Anderson NR. Tablets. In: The theory and practice
of industrial pharmacy, Edited by Lachman L and
Lieberman HA. CBS Publishers, Delhi.
2006: pp. 229.
20. Hirasawa N, Ishise S,
Miyata H and Danjo K.
Application of nilvadipine solid dispersion to tablet
formulation and manufacturing using crospovidone and
methylcellulose as dispersion carriers. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin.
52(2); 2004: 244-247.
Received on 26.03.2013
Modified on 01.04.2013
Accepted on 05.04.2013
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 5(2):
March- April, 2013, 99-106